Unisex is for hair salons

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

A coworker just had a baby girl, and I am handling his accounts till next week. Called her Finley.

Finley's a nice name, but I wish they would pick a girl's name for the girl. I know that Finley can be a girl's name, but doesn't it just sound more masculine to you? I do not really support the unisex naming convention. Boys named Sue. Girls named James. Occasionally it is cool: Tracey for a man (but not Tracy). In different parts of the world, Shannon is a man's name, and in others, a woman's name. But generally I am not so into female Conners, Ryans or Mikes, even if the full name makes sense. A friend knows a couple called Bev and Beverly. Hetero. Bev is short for Beverly. If I were a straight guy named Beverly, I'd jump on the opportunity to marry my namesake. How many people can claim this? I sure as hell can't. (But then, I do so like having a relatively unique name. I don't think I will meet anyone with the same first name in this life.)

So Finley is the next Mike? Is there a cultural androgynization taking place? More men in skirts? Metrosexuals? I dunno. I don't feel threatened, I just find it a little silly, like the people that name their sons Dorothy and spell it XPQY. You know, to be different like everyone else.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Unisex is for hair salons.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.cheeseorgy.net/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1723

Leave a comment

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Alston published on February 22, 2005 12:47 PM.

Genius in the family was the previous entry in this blog.

135 pounds later... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.